Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Bombardier ERP Implementation Reflection

Memo
To:
Senior Management
From:
Allison DeLorenzo
Date:
April 8, 2014
Re:
Bombardier ERP Implementation Reflection


This memo is prepared in response to the presentation held on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 with the consultant team, regarding how Bombardier can improve its ERP implementation at the third location and subsequent locations. As stated in the presentation, Bomardier's second implementation at Saint-Laurent greatly improved from its first implementation at Mirabel.  Bombardier wonderfully completed some facets of implementation. These facets included knowing why the company was implementing an ERP system, recognized the value in early planning, understood the business processes and planned for data migration. However, Bomardier fell short in key phases which if addressed properly could led to better implementation results.  The consultants discussed that Bombardier needs to improve upon building a business case for an ERP system with a positive ROI, gain executive and organizational commitment, ensure proper project management and resource commitment and invest in training/change management.

To address the inherent disconnect between management, employees and the project team and the issues mentioned above, a best practices framework was presented. After listening to the consultants recommendation and analyzing my own research, I agree that Bombardier needs to implement a best practices framework.  Even though the company greatly improved from the first implementation, there are still numerous issues not being addressed.  The best practices framework of presented was comprehensive and helps the company understand the importance facets.

One item I would address differently is regarding the invest in training and change management phase.  I would address these separately since they are very different items.  Investing in training is necessary and highly qualified trainers/consultants should be readily available to train and support users. A suggestion would be to formulate a detailed training program including materials and workshops prior to implementation.  As for change management, this needs to be a stand alone best practice. Change management should also include a business transformation plan which should identify roles and responsibilities that will change when the ERP is implemented.  Since employee's positions are based upon functions, the plan will introduce employees to new roles and assignments prior to implementing the ERP system.  By giving employees time to adjust to new responsibilities, this can alleviate the negative feelings towards learning a new system.

I believe the recommendation to adopt a best practices framework is in Bombardier's best interest.  The company has committed a great deal of financial and personnel resources to this project and implementation is key in determining overall success. The best practices framework should not only be carried out by the project team but also management while the employees should be aware of this framework. If the best practices framework is carried out properly, implementation at the third location is projected to surpass the Saint-Laurent implementation.

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Bombardier “Successfully Navigating the Turbulent Skies of a Large-Scale ERP Implementation"


Problem/Issue Statement

Through acquisitions and expansion, Bombardier Aerospace inherited data, processes and specific systems of each company.   This “silo organization” model resulted in problems and inefficiencies especially in inventory, through the purchasing and procurement department. The individual systems did not communicate with each other efficiently and it was difficult to share data between all facilities. 


Due to these inefficiencies and problems, Bombardier Aerospace committed to replacing its legacy systems with a state-of-the-art integrated Enterprise Resource System. Implementing an ERP system was thought to be the answer to maintaining a competitive advantage in the turbulent market.   The primary goal of the system was to improve the visibility and reduce the value of the inventory held by the company.


These large ERP systems are complex and frequently result in lower than expected performance. Research has shown that less than 50% of implementations achieve expected benefits while only 17% of the companies experiences more than eighty percent of their projected benefits.  After the first failed attempt to implement an ERP system in 2000 costing the company about $130 million, the company decided to hire a consultant company, assembled an in-house ERP development team and establish a new vision throughout the organization “One Company”.



After years of development and delays, Bombardier decided to implement the Bombardier Manufacturing Information System (BMIS) one plant at a time, the first being at the Mirabel plant located near Montreal. The second implementation occurred at the Saint-Laurent plant.

The main problem the company facing during the implementation/roll out phase of the ERP system. Even though there was an improvement in the efficiency and success of execution at Saint-Laurent plant from the first implementation at Mirabel, there is room for great improvement. There is an inherent disconnect between the business and project team causing a lack of communication. This is adversely affecting the roll out and training periods. To address the main problem going forward, the company needs to prepare a Best Practices framework to follow.



The following symptoms have been identified:

·        lack of communication between business and project team;

·        specialized knowledge concentrated in a few individuals;

·        members of management who are openly adverse to the new system;

·        training was not seen as a priority;

·        new system was not see as a priority with business members;

·        lack of time for training/poor time management;

·        employees still utilizing legacy systems to complete functions of their jobs;

·        embellishing scorecards to hid issues;

·        lack of protocol to measure success of implementation;

·        employees lack a general understanding as to why they were being sent for training and why the system was necessary;

·        training was intense and users complained it focused on exceptions and details;

·        employee roles were still being defined during the implementation causing further questioning;

·        issues timing of when to roll out at different locations/departments;

·        lack of methods/protocol to address change orders or errors with technology;

·        Users lack of ownership of the system;



The scope of the problem involves the rest of the plants and locations of Bombardier that will implement the ERP system. This includes over 27,130 employees and13 facilities worldwide. Before moving further in the implementation process, it is imperative to establish best practices to ensure a seamless transition for the employees and the project team. Bombardier has already improved from the first roll out, so these best practices later identified will enhance the process.  Using a best practices framework, will rely on management to take a proactive role in the implementation and embrace the new ERP system. 



Situation Assessment

The context of the problem is based on the implementation (both positively and negatively) at the first two locations: Mirabel and Saint-Laurent.  The context of the problem stems from not having a consistent plan for rolling out the ERP system which causes issues with the project team, employees and management.  The lack of best practices is causes disorganization and distress among trainers and employees.


When assessing which Best Practices Bombardier should include in the framework, the following decision criteria should be considered:

·        Set clear goals and objectives

·        Stronger communication between management and employees and between project team and company

·        Gain management’s support for ERP

·        Address the timing issue

·        Address training issues





List of Plausible Alternative Courses of Action

The alternative course of action for Bombardier is to adopt a Best Practices framework for ERP implementation.  After researching ERP Best Practices from numerous corporations and consulting firms, eight key requirements have been identified.  These key requirements address not only the main problem but also the symptoms.   


The best practices framework Bombardier should implement are based on the following:


1)     Understand business processes and key requirement.

The absolute first step in executing any business system is to gain a thorough understanding of the processes that comprise the business operations. A complete knowledge of the business processes is essential for implementing an ERP system. In addition, prioritizing business requirements is very important.  The best strategy for this is to satisfy immediate business needs then longer-term objectives. The project team should discuss with employees their everyday work and what it entails.This will eliminate the discount between the new software and employees.


2)     Clear goals and objectives.

The next step in the best practice framework should be to define clear goals and objectives on three fronts: project team, business management and employees.  These goals should also be obtainable and define the benefits the company expects from implementing an ERP system. Employees need to know why the system is necessary. The new ERP system affects many departments throughout the organization and by making goals/objectives clear it will help everyone get a sense of the company’s direction. It will also create a sense of responsibility to individual employees. 

3)     Choosing the right software.

Bombardier needs to match the software to the organization’s needs, business processes, functional requirements and normal business operations. For example, Bombardier chose to use SAP and implement the BMIS system for manufacturing facilities.  

4)     Ensure proper project management and resource commitment

A dedicated project manager who is involved in both planning and ongoing management is essential to implementing an ERP system. In addition, Bombardier needs to commit resources to the project through all phases of implementation.  This includes financial support, management support and end user support. Bombardier has shown a commitment to this project, however it should maintain this commitment until completion.

5)     Gain executive and organizational commitment

In order for the goals and objectives to be clearly communicated to the organization, executives and top management need to support the ERP system. Management should hold ramp up/roll out meetings to address the benefits of the system and why the company is choosing to implement it.  In addition, this will foster a positive attitude toward changing to an ERP system since people are inherently adverse to change. The was seen at the Saint-Laurent location which positively helped implementation.

6)     Plan early

Bombardier should prepare a detailed plan outlining the implementation plan and timeline for each location.  By pinpointing particular steps and addressing when and how they will be done will take the guess work out during the critical implementation phase. As seen in the first two roll outs, business personnel did not communicate in a timely manner to employees regarding training sessions. In addition, timing of implementation to consider the business functions it is affecting.  For example, implementing the new financial/accounting system in the fourth quarter is not the best decision.  

7)     Invest in training

Since employee roles and responsibilities can be affected by the ERP, training should concentrate on business workflows and how these changes affect job roles and the people who do the work. In addition, highly qualified trainers/consultants should be readily available to train and support users on the daily use of the system including addressing issues that may occur.  A detailed training program should also be established and adhered to.

8)     Change management/business transformation plan

Bombardier should prepare a business transformation plan. This includes identifying roles and responsibilities that will change when the ERP is implemented. Employees need to be introduces to new processes and job roles over a period of time so they have time to adjust. As seen in Bombardier, the planners and buyers did not have ample time to adjust which negatively affected the implementation and caused resistance to the ERP system.


Evaluation of Alternatives

When evaluating the eight key requirements for the best practices framework, it is important to analyze which option covers all of most of the main problem, symptoms and decision criteria. The best practices framework helps the implementation process by planning early, enhances the communication between management, project team and employees and addresses the lack of commitment by the business personnel.  In addition, these eight key requirements give the project team and management a road map of all the moving parts involved in the implementation process.  Bombardier should review and analyze these eight requirements and make additional or revisions as they see fit.   

Bombardier needs to be realistic in choosing the key requirements that are incorporates into the best practices framework. Eight best practice requirements have been identified, now Bombardier should review them and see which fit their needs. These best practices should be incorporates at the third location's implementation and all subsequent locations.

      Recommendation

After reviewing the issues Bombardier experienced at the first two locations, it is clear that the company needs to incorporate a best practices framework.  My recommendation is to use some or all of the key requirements identified above.  By using a best practices framework, Bombardier will not only improve on the technical implementation but it will also address the negative feelings held by employees.  The framework will generate commitment from management which in turn will help communicate the positive changes to employees. Bombardier also needs to set clear goals and objectives and communicate them to the entire business.  This will help employees understand why the BMIS is being implemented.  Bombardier should also plan early for the roll out at each location including proper notification, training schedules, and provide a detailed plan of how/when implementation will occur.  Bombardier’s business personnel should plan accordingly and change roles and responsibilities prior to implementation.  This will alleviate employee frustration and distress.  Training should be provided to all employees before, during and after implementation.  The project team should prepare a detailed training plan for each location, including the training schedules, contact information and materials. 







Presentation



      If I were presenting as a consultant to the class, I would state that I have been commissioned to identify some of the Best Practice frameworks that exist and could be applied to Bombardier.  I would discuss how each key requirement can be used during the BMIS implementation process. 



      I would detail the main problem and issues faced during implementation.  I would also address the decisions criteria and the needs of the company.  I would discuss the eight Best Practices requirements identified.   



     Visual aids to be used in presentation:



o   PowerPoint presentation for the major issues/symptoms occurring during implementation locations;

o   Decision criteria for the best practices framework; and

o   How the best practice requirements can be incorporated in Bombardier.



I would “sell” the eight key requirements to Bombardier by stressing the importance of adopting a best practice framework.  The company needs a detailed plan that provides solutions to the main problem and symptoms.  All of the key requirements can be applied to company and will aid in improving the implementation of the BMIS system.  Since the implementation process is already improving,  by addressing the rest of the symptoms will create a seamless transition not only for the project team but for the business personnel and employees. 

Should ABC Law Firm Invest in Microsoft Project?

ABC Law Firm depends on Microsoft Excel and Word for preparing diagrams, tables, charts and flow charts which are incorporated throughout the practice. For example, the firm relies on a bullet point checklist to ensure the proper steps are completed when a new employee is hired through the employee orientation day or to ensure proper documents are presented during a real estate transaction.  In addition, timelines are prepared in Word and Excel to ensure proper litigation calendaring for important dates and filings with the Court. Preparing charts and table timelines in Excel and Word can be time consuming and the customization features are limited.  


After researching Microsoft Project as a possible software application for the firm, I found it has a multitude of functions and is a robust software program. Microsoft Project enables the user to organize tasks, duration of tasks, predecessor events, assign resources/employees and organizes the tasks into numerous charts including Gantt charts and network diagrams.  The user can designate a team planner, monitor usage of resources and track progress.  Microsoft project also enables the user to generate reports such as resource allocation, cost overview, project overview and task completion/milestone. As a first time user of Microsoft Project, I found the software to be complicated and extremely detailed. In order to use the program to its highest functionality, training needs to be completed. 

Now the question is presented: Should ABC Law Firm Invest in Microsoft Project?

Microsoft Project is a wonderful program to illustrate, monitor and report on projects with numerous moving parts, personnel and resources.  The exceptional detail in the functionality offered by Project is simply not necessary for the legal work conducted at ABC Law Firm. The firm does not partake in large resource planning projects, employee scheduling or projects where this program could be utilized. The only function of Project that ABC Law Firm would benefit from is the timeline however, if the firm invests in Microsoft Visio that need will be fulfilled. This program is better suited for project management firms, real estate developers both commercial and residential and IT developers. 

At this point in time, ABC Law firm should not invest in Microsoft Project. The size of the firm coupled with the work conducted simply does not warrant an investment into this program.

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Business Impacts of Virtualization on ABC Law Firm

ABC Law Firm currently uses Windows 7 and all Windows based software and applications including Microsoft Office 2007.  The accounting system, Tabs3, and the document management system, Worldox, run on a Windows based platform.  An alternative to a Windows operating system is a Linux based operating system called Ubuntu which has very similar capabilities to Windows.  Ubuntu offers Libre Office that including word processing, spreadsheet and presentation applications. Ubuntu is an open source operating system where numerous contributors can change, modify and re-compile the code to fit their needs.  In addition, Ubuntu is free of charge and offers an application called Wine that can make Windows based software and applications compatible with and run on Ubuntu. 

The question is posed: Should ABC Law Firm virtualize the workstations with Ubuntu as an alternative operating system?  Virtualization refers to creating a virtual version of something rather than an actual version, which can be used on computer hardware, operating systems or desktops. 

After researching this alternative, there is a major security threat posed with running Ubuntu on the workstations of ABC Law Firm.  Since the operating system is open source, anyone can program back door access which could lead to security risks. This could lead to confidential data being comprised including employee and client financials and personal information.

In addition, Wine acts as a API layer between Ubuntu and the Windows based software.  Wine does not guarantee that the accounting system and document management system will operate with Ubuntu which again can cause major concerns.  Since the firm is in its fourth year of operation, investing in another accounting system and document management system would not be prudent.

Another dimension to review is the third party support agreements the firm has in place.  ABC Law Firm has third party support agreements in place with Tabs3 in the amount of $3,000 per year and Worldox $2,800 per year. These two software programs are specifically made to run on a Windows based platform. If the firm was to run these applications through Wine and Ubuntu, the service agreements can be null and void leading to further issues for the firm.  Lastly, our third party IT representative would not be able to support Ubuntu since he does not have specialized training in it.  Lastly, centralized Linux/Ubuntu support may be difficult to locate and is costlier than Windows which can about increase IT costs.

This analysis is purely addressing the drawbacks to virtualizing the workstations with Ubuntu as an alternative operating system.   It would be in ABC Law Firm's best interest not to use Ubuntu as a dual operating system. In addition, this analysis does not consider the training costs involved including lost billable hours, installation of Ubuntu and maintenance.


However, desktop virtualization has proved to be a highly effective means of conducting business for ABC Law Firm. ABC Law Firm established desktop virtualization or virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) for all employees through its remote access. When employees are not physically in the office, they can access their workstations through a specific remote access website. Employees are designated to a specific workstation with a username and password. Employees can interact or "log in" to the host computer (workstation) using another desktop computer, laptop or mobile device through an internet connection. 

The firm's data and confidential information is never actually saved to employees' personal desktops or laptops since it could create potential security risks. In addition, if personal devices are infected with a virus the firm's workstations and server will be protected since no information actually exists on the personal devices.  

The question is posed: Has desktop virtualization had any impacts both positively or negatively on ABC Law Firm?

One major impact that desktop virtualization had for the firm was during Hurricane Sandy. The firm's physical office was without power and employees were not able to travel to and from the office. Remote access granted employees the ability to work from home and continue generating revenue through billable hours.    

The table below describes the potential lost revenue if the firm did not implement desktop virtualization. As one can see, the firm could have lost about $180,000.00 during those 8 days without physical access to the office.  That would have had a significant impact on a firm only in its second year of operation.  Desktop virtualization is a wonderful tool to provide employees not only during inclement weather days but also while traveling or attending meetings.

Potentially Lost Revenue
TitleHourly RateAverage Hours Billed Per DayTotal Revenue Per DayWork Days without PowerTotal Lost Revenue
Partner 1 $425.00        7 $2,975.00             8 $23,800.00
Partner 2 $375.00        7 $2,625.00             8 $21,000.00
Partner 3 $375.00        7 $2,625.00             8 $21,000.00
Of Counsel 1 $350.00        7 $2,450.00             8 $19,600.00
Of Counsel 2 $350.00        7 $2,450.00             8 $19,600.00
Of Counsel 3 $350.00        7 $2,450.00             8 $19,600.00
Of Counsel 4 (part time) $350.00        4 $1,400.00             8 $11,200.00
Of Counsel 5 (part time) $350.00        4 $1,400.00             8 $11,200.00
Associate $250.00        7 $1,750.00             8 $14,000.00
Paralegal 1 $125.00        5 $625.00             8 $5,000.00
Paralegal 2 $125.00        5 $625.00             8 $5,000.00
Paralegal 3 $125.00        5 $625.00             8 $5,000.00
Paralegal 4 (part time) $125.00        4 $500.00             8 $4,000.00










TOTAL REVENUE LOST $180,000.00


Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Strategic IT Transformation at Accenture Reflection

Memo
To:
Senior Management
From:
Allison DeLorenzo
Date:
March 5, 2014
Re:
Strategic IT Transformation at Accenture Reflection


This memo is prepared in response to the presentation held on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 with ConsultCube LLC, a United States consultant team, regarding whether Accenture should invest in and implement a completely new IT governance framework, COBIT 5 or maintain its current IT governance system. As stated in the presentation, the main criteria driving this decision are cost efficiency, regulatory compliance, risk and business process management, training, and flexible control. Accenture is currently using its own IT governance system that was created as a result of the re-branding from Arthur Anderson in 2001.  The current system consists of steering committees, project sponsors and an ROI auditing process. In addition, the current system is cost effective and has aided in the overall reduction in IT costs (i.e. approximately $8,000 savings per employee due to new infrastructure and IT governance system).

After listening to the consultants recommendation and analyzing the risks involved with both courses of action, I agree that Accenture should maintain its current IT governance system. Even though COBIT 5 is used worldwide and incorporates industry-proven best practices and applications, Accenture's current model already has these practices and standards in place that prove to be working effectively.  The current IT governance system addresses 4 of the 5 main principles of COBIT 5 including risk/regulatory compliance analysis, monitoring and measuring IT projects. The fifth principle requires a decentralized management style which would change Accenture greatly. The system was specifically developed for Accenture whereas COBIT 5 is generic and can be applied to all industries.  By maintaining Accenture's current system, the company will avoid COBIT 5 material costs, exorbitant training costs, constultant fees and loss of productivity.   Lastly, the current system is flexible and can adapt as Accenture grows. 


One interesting fact that was discussed during the meeting was that at the present time there is no evidence of other IT companies comparable to Accenture that have implemented COBIT 5.  Due to this fact, there is no tangible measure of how a COBIT 5 accreditation will impact business and what the company can gain from it which further solidifies the recommendation to maintain the current governance system. 

I believe this recommendation to maintain the current governance system will aid in Accenture's future growth and IT cost reductions. Adopting COBIT 5 is not a prudent decision at this time. 

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Strategic IT Transformation at Accenture


Problem/Issue Statement

When Accenture was created/rebranded in 2001, it faced a critical decision on whether to continue using the legacy system from Arthur Anderson or take advantage of opportunity and created a completely new IT infrastructure. Accenture decided to accept the challenge and overhaul its information technology systems. Accenture adopted a one-platform approach, streamlined applications, sought out new vendors/supplies while greatly reducing the IT expenditures across the world. Accenture is very proud of this accomplishment since very few organizations of that size have successfully completed such a massive undertaking.


As a consulting company, Accenture wanted to implement its own advice by simplifying processes and technology whenever possible while also maintaining state-of-the-art industry leading IT infrastructure. 

However, Accenture is currently considering upgrading the IT governance system to Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT) to enhance its business standards and reporting.  COBIT 5 is being considered due to the countless regulations and compliance standards Accenture must comply with around the world. If adopted the system will help aid in measuring IT programs success, align with business goals and seek to ensure best practices is used. 

The symptoms of using the current IT governance system includes a lack sophistication to measure the successfulness of IT projects including tools, computer programs, may not align strategically with business goals and does not address the multitude of regulations and compliance standard that must be adhered to.  

If Accenture decides to implement COBIT 5, symptoms of this problem include training staff for accreditation on the system, creating a team to oversee that COBIT 5 is being used properly, costs involved with training or COBIT support and aversion to learning a new IT governance system. 

Implementing COBIT will affect Accenture globally, employees, IT infrastructure and most importantly how business is conducted. This would also involve assembling a high trained IT group to roll out/maintain the new COBIT 5 governance system and train all employees. 

Situation Assessment

     When Accenture implemented a new IT governance system during the IT overhaul an approval process, steering committee and yearly audits of IT projects were instituted.  During this shift in IT, Accenture also implemented a new IT Governance system to administer its IT decisions going forward. This new approach required high-level management and Accenture’s senior IT staff to work together to define the IT horizon for the fiscal year. The IT project selection philosophy changed drastically under this new system.  A formal process was established where IT projects were presented to the steering committee. All projects had to have a senior business sponsor, whose duty was to convince other members of the business value in the proposal. If a sponsor’s project was approved, he or she took responsibility for extracting the claimed value of the project.      IT initiative presented in the committee had to be accompanied by a clear ROI analysis    
     
          Approved projects were subject to an annual audit for three years. Audits sought to verify that the projected value effectively had been created; sought to calibrate Accenture’s ability to predict value creation in IT initiatives by comparing predicted value to realize value and learning from mistakes that created a disparity between two; audits sought to keep both business sponsor and IT team on their feet by proactively managing the project well after it was approved

 The decision criteria for implementing COBIT 5:

·        Must address the gaps not covered by the current IT governance system
·        Organization system for compliance and regulation of IT standards across the world
·        Evaluate, Direct and Monitor functions and processes within the company
·        IT valuation/effectiveness of projects
·        Address information security, provide business models
·        IT Assurance Framework
·        Align, plan and organize business goals of the company
·        Monitor and assess IT risk



List of Plausible Alternative Courses of Action

There are two courses of action identified and both options address the main problem in different ways:


Implement COBIT 5
PROS
CONS
One of the most commonly used frameworks to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley
Addresses the governance and management of IT from an enterprise-wide perspective
COBIT is based on all other IT best practices
Used as a complimentary to other best practices -ITIL, TOGAF, ISO27000 and PRINCE2
Provides a comprehensive framework that assists enterprises in achieving their objectives for the governance and management of enterprise information and technology assets
Non-technical and understandable management thinking
Contains good practices, RACI charts, performance assessment and monitoring tools
Includes implementation guidance
Seeks to  evaluate, direct and monitor; align, plan and organize; build, acquire and implement; deliver, service and support and monitor, evaluate and assess
Training costs for experienced IT employees; workshops, in-house training with people who will be engaged in a roll out
Costs associated with consultant costs
Costs associated with materials including:
COBIT 5: Enabling Processes, $135 non-members ISACA/ $35 members
COBIT 5 Enabling Information, $135 non-members ISACA/ $35 members
COBIT 5 Implementation, $150 non-members ISACA/ $35 members
COBIT 5 for Information Security, $175 non-members ISACA/ $35 members
COBIT 5 for Assurance $175 non-members ISACA/ $35 members
COBIT 5 for Risk $175 non-members ISACA/ $35 members
Annual membership dues and chapter dues
Employee resistance to new IT governance system
COBIT may not be as detailed in terms of how to do certain functions and is too board

Maintain current IT Governance System
PROS
CONS
No additional training costs or materials
No employee resistance to new system
Current system is efficiently operating and has been since the IT overhaul in 2001
Steering committees have been effective in decision making since inception which reduced IT costs, implemented new philosophy for the IT department (IT as a business rather than a cost center)
Continue their existing value chain and reporting systems that virtually revolve around the clock while ‘following the sun.’
Measuring techniques and tools may not be all encompassing and may fall to subjectivity
Is not as sophisticated as COBIT, lacks models for oversight and monitoring
Does it properly measure and evaluate risk?
Is current system all encompassing?
Gaps in current IT governance system

 Evaluation of Alternatives
 
When evaluating the two courses of action, it is important to analyze which option will align with Accenture’s decision criteria, accommodate future growth and be cost effective. The pros and cons of both alternatives: implement COBIT 5 or maintain current IT governance should be analyzed and evaluated. Accenture should decide if COBIT 5 will effectively fill in the gaps of their current IT governance system or if it will be too broad. Accenture should also analyze if COBIT 5 provides better tools in monitoring, measuring and assessing IT projects. The costs involved implementing COBIT 5 including training costs, consultant fees, roll out costs and materials should also be evaluated.

The evaluation relates to the decision criteria developed because it analyzes whether COBIT 5 can effectively fill in the gaps of the current system or provide new insights in monitoring and assessing IT projects.  COBIT 5 will be all encompassing and not just limited to the IT functions.

Accenture can be imaginative in this decision since the real value of COBIT 5 cannot be assessed until it is implemented.  The Accenture needs to determine if COBIT 5 can add value to the current operating processes and determine if that value is worth the training costs, material costs and new system costs.

Recommendation

After considering both courses of action, I believe the quality and logical recommendation is to maintain the current IT governance system. With an investment that will incur high employee training costs, consultant fees, materials costs, loss of productivity, and possible backlash from employees, the risks associated with implementing COBIT 5 outweigh the benefits.  

Even though COBIT 5 is used worldwide and incorporates industry-proven best practices and applications, Accenture’s current model already has these practices and standards in place that prove to be working effectively.  COBIT 5 may be redundant to what Accenture already has in place. For example, COBIT 5 seeks to have a greater control over IT governance and regulations/standards. Accenture has already addressed these issues through their steering committees, project sponsors and ROI auditing process. In addition, a number of other COBIT 5 standards were covered during Accenture’s IT restructuring which include linking IT processes to the business objectives through processes such as IT support on a per need basis through an internal customer. Furthermore, I believe Accenture’s current IT governance system addresses most of the key functions offered by COBIT 5 and implementation is not needed at this time.

Presentation

·         If I were presenting as a consultant to the class, I would state that I have been commissioned to identify the benefits and drawbacks involved with implementing COBIT 5 to the IT governance system. I would discuss the costs and training involved with COBIT 5 and provide insight into what the framework can offer Accenture. I would discuss the current IT governance system’s functionality and overall successfulness. I would provide examples of controls already in places such as the ROI audits and project sponsors. 


Visual aids to be used in presentation:

  • PowerPoint presentation for benefits and drawbacks of each course of action;
  • Decision criteria for Accenture; and
  • Recommendations for maintain current IT governance system

I would “sell” the current IT governance system by stressing it is a successful system that Accenture implemented in 2001.  Accenture’s current IT governance system addresses most of the key functions offered by COBIT 5 and implementation is not needed at this time. The company would not be incurring additional costs for COBIT 5, redundancies would not be present and training costs would not be incurred. 

·         Other Delivery Consideration to Keep in Mind:
  • Pros and cons of both courses of action
  • Obstacles with implanting COBIT 5 including learning curve, training costs and consultant fees.